Forensic evidence supports Officer Wilson's version of events in Michael Brown shooting

Not only does the evidence support the officer's version of events in the Michael Brown killing, it also places the idea that Brown had his hands up when he was shot in grave doubt. Washington Post: Some of the physical evidence — including blood spatter analysis, shell casings and ballistics tests — also supports Wilson’s account of the shooting, The Post’s sources said, which casts Brown as an aggressor who threatened the officer’s life. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are prohibited from publicly discussing the case. The grand jury is expected to complete its deliberations next month over whether Wilson broke the law in confronting Brown, and the pending decision appears to be prompting the unofficial release of information about the case and what the jurors have been told. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch late Tuesday night published Brown’s official county autopsy report, an analysis of which also...(Read Full Post)